| Overall Rating |
 |
| Description |
| Recently replaced, this top-value Punto stands between the successful mid-Nineties car and the current range. It's nice to drive with willing engines. The interior is roomy and practical. |
| Handling |
 |
| Comfort |
|
| Quality & Reliability |
|
| Performance |
|
| Roominess |
|
| Running Costs |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
|
| NCAP |
| 4 |
| Best Models |
| 1.2 16v HLX & Eleganza; 1.8 HGT |
| Worst Models |
| Basic 1.2 & 1.9D |
| Replacement |
| by current generation Punto in late 2003 |
|
| Road Test |
| Punto Mk 2 is closer to the current car than the 1994 original. It offers high safety standards, attractive styling, good equipment levels, plenty of room for four, and excellent affordability. It also feels well put together for an inexpensive supermini - probably thanks to its strong bodyshell. All versions are pleasing to drive, with the 'City' setting on the standard power steering making parking and low-speed manoeuvres a doddle. The optional 'Speedgear' sequential transmission on the 1.2 16v is a less proven benefit - a bit gimmicky, perhaps. The 1.2 16v engine gives the best compromise between performance and economy: it puts out 20bhp more than the sturdy old 8-valve 1.2. The 130bhp 1.8 HGT is a scorcher. Of the two diesels, the modern JTD wins hands down over the harsh old 1.9D. Reliability is good so far, and running costs are comparable with Fiesta or Corsa if depreciation is excluded. |
| Positive Points |
- Superb value since being replaced in 2003
- Surprisingly spacious for its size
- Safer than most rival superminis
|
| Negative Points |
- Will continue to lose value quickly
- Ride could be better
- Confusing range line-up and badging
|
|
