| Overall Rating |
 |
| Description |
| The original Freelander is a practical alternative to a family estate car. Its smart looks, status and civilised manners are appealing but it's quite pricey to run. |
| Handling |
|
| Comfort |
|
| Quality & Reliability |
|
| Performance |
 |
| Roominess |
|
| Running Costs |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
|
| NCAP |
| 3 |
| Best Models |
| 2.0 Td4 ES 5-door |
| Worst Models |
| Thirsty V6 Auto models |
|
 |
| Road Test |
| The Land Rover badge assures Freelander buyers that their money is going into quality 4x4 technology; it also boosts the desirability of this likeable 'lifestyle' 4x4. But with CR-V, RAV 4 and Forester (to name but three) breathing down its exhaust pipe, is Freelander really worth the extra? Two facelifts and many evolutionary changes since its 1997 launch have kept Freelander fresh. It holds its value well; costlier high specification cars are actually preferred by used car buyers. But reliability isn't up to Honda/Toyota/Subaru levels, and some rivals are also roomier. More than capable off-road, Freelander also drives sweetly around town - where many of them spend their lives. It rolls when cornered hard but is otherwise fairly agile and car-like. Most popular engine choice is the BMW-sourced 2.0 Td4, which pulls well and gives nearly 35 mpg. The 1.8i is quite adequate, but the livelier auto-only 2.5 V6 is thirsty. |
| Positive Points |
- Stylish compact off-roader; still fashionable
- Easy and car-like to drive; feels quite lively
- Land Rover heritage; good off-road ability
|
| Negative Points |
- A bit expensive alongside CR-V, RAV and Forester
- V6 is thirsty and comes with auto only
- Some rivals offer more room in the back
|
|
