| Overall Rating |
 |
| Description |
| 306 is many things: family holdall; sporty hatchback; stylish cabriolet; and load-lugging estate. Easy to own, good to drive and fairly economical to run, it represents sound value now. |
| Handling |
 |
| Comfort |
|
| Quality & Reliability |
|
| Performance |
|
| Roominess |
|
| Running Costs |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
 |
| NCAP |
| 3 |
| Best Models |
| 2.0 XSi; 2.0 HDi turbo-diesels; cabriolets |
| Worst Models |
| Low spec 1.4 and 1.9D versions; saloons |
| Replacement |
| by Peugeot 307 in mid-2001 |
|
 |
| Road Test |
| Despite being an older design, 306 has big attractions for the value-conscious buyer. The line-up offers as much choice as Escort or Astra (1991-98); 306's excellent ride quality helps it rise above these rivals. And handling is way ahead of mid-Nineties family car standards - it's responsive and confidence-inspiring. Engines start with 1.4 and 1.9D units, but it's the 1.6, 1.9 D Turbo, 2.0 HDi and GTi-style 2.0 XSi that make the best of 306's abilities. There are true 'hot hatch' choices, too: the 150+ bhp S16 and GTi-6. Occupant comfort is above-average, boosted by the superior ride. Adults have reasonable rear legroom and seats are comfortable, though taller drivers may complain of tight headroom on cars with a factory-fitted sunroof. Interior trim looks good on newer cars but often gets rattly and tatty as the years mount up. Recommended as a stylish yet sensible value choice. |
| Positive Points |
- Big on choice, big on value
- Best ride in class for a mid-90s design
- Pleasant to drive and handles well
|
| Negative Points |
- Shows its age quickly, especially inside
- Older diesel versions can be noisy
- 1.4 and 1.9D are plodding and dull
|
|
