| Overall Rating |
 |
| Description |
| Vectra simply falls short of Mondeo as a mid-Nineties family car. It's comfortable and cheap to run, but Mondeo, Primera and Laguna are all nicer to drive. |
| Handling |
|
| Comfort |
 |
| Quality & Reliability |
|
| Performance |
|
| Roominess |
|
| Running Costs |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
|
| NCAP |
| 3 |
| Best Models |
| SRi; 2.0 16v; 2.2 DTi |
| Worst Models |
| 1.6 8v; 1.7 TDS & 2.0 Di |
| Replacement |
| by current generation Vectra in Spring 2002 |
|
| Road Test |
| Vectra sold well to fleet users with a keen eye on the bottom line. Now heavily depreciated, it's a sound choice for the undemanding family driver. There's good equipment on most versions, adequate safety standards, and room for five in a comfortable cabin. Running costs are attractively low, but avoid the penny-pinching 1.6 8v or older diesels - they're slow and not very refined. 1.8 16v is the most popular petrol unit; the 2.0 16v has a useful performance edge and is no thirstier. V6 models are fast but cost considerably more in fuel, servicing and insurance - and Vectra's handling really doesn't match the V6's power. Choose Vectra as a comfortable cruiser, not a B-road hustler, where handling lacks Mondeo?s tautness and ride gets jittery. Reliability is no better than average, so service history counts for a lot. Interiors don't wear that well, so high-milers are inevitably much cheaper. |
| Positive Points |
- Good value; a cheaper choice than Mondeo
- Low running costs for a medium family car
- Comfortable family holdall
|
| Negative Points |
- Handling lacks precision
- Indifferent ride
- So-so reliability and durability
|
|
