| Overall Rating |
 |
| Description |
| Ford aimed the American-inspired Cougar at more mature motorists. It's good looking and its Mondeo-derived mechanicals perform well, but it was neither sporty nor special enough to make its mark. |
| Handling |
|
| Comfort |
|
| Quality & Reliability |
 |
| Performance |
|
| Roominess |
|
| Running Costs |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
|
| NCAP |
| not tested |
| Best Models |
| 2.5 V6 24v X-Pack |
| Worst Models |
| 2.0 16v without extras |
| Replacement |
| n/a |
|
 |
| Road Test |
| Sleek in a Puma-meets-Mondeo manner, Cougar is really a big pussycat. It drives and handles precisely, although even the 170 bhp 2.5 V6 engine won't excite sportier drivers. But view it as a comfy long-distance mile-muncher and you won't be disappointed. As a used choice, Cougar majors on value plus sensible running costs thanks to that blue oval badge. Full four-seater capacity and a decent boot are bonuses in a sector where rear seats are often a gesture. Standard spec is generous, with the X-Pack adding extra goodies like leather upholstery. Quality was an issue on some early cars, though most problems were sorted quickly and ongoing reliability is Mondeo-class. Safety features are good, though Cougar was never NCAP rated. If you're a Ford fan looking for something a bit different from a sporty Mondeo, Cougar may fit the bill, though its rarity means there's not much choice out there. |
| Positive Points |
- Stylish four-seater coupe for sensible money
- Good equipment levels, especially with X-Pack
- Smooth, sporty, satisfying 2.5 V6 engine
|
| Negative Points |
- Feels and looks too American for some
- Coarse ride at low speeds
- 2.0 16v gets harsh when pushed hard
|
|
